“We need twelve percent growth.”
- What it means
- Commercial target
- What RabbitHawk checks
- Keep it as a target, not demand
RabbitHawk Forecast Interventions
A supplier runs late. A promotion moves. Roadworks block a store entrance. RabbitHawk captures what changed, tests which forecasts and plans it could affect and shows planners what to review before anything official changes.
Modelled planning walkthrough
RabbitHawk captures the notice, asks for missing facts, tests whether the forecast and a still-open decision should change, and keeps the saved forecast as the reference until a planner approves an update. Need the connected action plan? See Forecasting & Optimization.
The language layer organizes the evidence. Versioned numerical models calculate the forecast. A planner approves any official change.
Why this is hard today
A store, region and planner may each know something useful. But when they edit the number one after another, the final forecast no longer shows what changed, why or who approved it.
A useful supplier email or customer conversation becomes a number with no reusable evidence attached.
The next edit replaces the last, so nobody can see which evidence moved the forecast.
What the business wants to sell is mistaken for what customers are likely to buy.
Pack sizes, timing, stock and other limits can leave the same order or transfer in place. Check before triggering another replan.
Not every message means more or less demand
A target belongs with goals. A production limit belongs with supply. A customer update may change demand. RabbitHawk sorts that out before any forecast is recalculated.
“We need twelve percent growth.”
“We have too much stock.”
“Production can make only 5,000.”
“The promotion has changed.”
“A distributor heard orders may fall.”
“The buyer disclosed cash pressure.”
How it works
Turn an email, notice or conversation into evidence with a source, time and affected business scope.
Ask for facts that could change the assessment, not a percentage override or another forecast number.
People contribute evidence and correct assumptions. RabbitHawk's probabilistic model computes the forecast for the affected scope.
Compare every saved forecast with what happened and improve the process without ranking people.
Keep the record
Keep the saved forecast, the evidence, each review and the eventual outcome. Compare every saved forecast version against the same outcome to learn which kinds of evidence deserve attention.
Exact incumbent distribution and cutoff
First context-conditioned forecast
Reviewed belief and reforecast
Governed forecast version
Official forecast delta
Outcome and scoring evidence
RabbitHawk looks for repeatable patterns across comparable cases. A miss on one case does not prove bias, gaming or poor judgment.
Learning proposals
Evaluate before you expand
Select the products, locations, forecast cycles and decisions that make the evaluation meaningful.
Use the history, actuals, product and location structure, and saved forecast versions needed for a short audit or shadow evaluation.
Compare the results and approval flow before deciding whether to connect more of the business.
A practical first evaluation
Choose a representative subset of products, locations and forecast cycles. Run it for a defined period in audit or shadow mode while the official plan stays unchanged.
Choose a representative subset of products, locations and forecast cycles. Run it for a defined period before deciding whether to connect more.
Scope a short evaluation